{"schema":"sb.truth.v1","subject":"election-alabama-republican","title":"The Election: Alabama & Republican record","tier":"standard","tierNote":"Standard-tier record, generated from the maintained event registry: reporting, our coverage metric, market expectation, and state history. No primary-source layer yet — first-party issuer verification is what upgrades a record to full tier, the discipline the hormuz record demonstrates.","subjectBinding":{"entity":"alabama","bound":true,"basis":"named-in-subject","statement":"Lead subject \"alabama\" — named in this record's own subject line (\"Election: Alabama & Republican\"). The reporting, record, market and state-history layers below are that subject's own; none is borrowed from a neighbouring entity. Not bound: republicans, senate — the registry attaches them to this event, but the subject line does not name them.","candidatesConsidered":["alabama","republican","republicans","senate"],"alsoDefensible":["republican"],"rejected":["republicans","senate"],"actionClass":"election"},"publishState":"published","publishStateNote":null,"asOf":"2026-09-01","generatedAt":"2026-09-01T15:11:18.454578+00:00","tracked":true,"access":"Free — no key, no charge. Serves at GET /api/truth/election-alabama-republican and answers the get_truth_object MCP tool. (No exhibit page for standard-tier records yet — the API and MCP responses ARE the record.)","attribution":"Cite 'Signal Bureau' with https://sigb.ai/api/truth/election-alabama-republican so readers can verify.","layers":{"primarySources":{"label":"Observed operational state","status":"absent","basis":"not present on a standard-tier record — no first-party issuer has been routed for this subject yet; nothing here is previewed to look finished","sources":[]},"reporting":{"label":"Observed reporting","basis":"attributed sources — outside coverage in our tracked set; verify at the source. Prediction-market question pages are excluded: a venue question is not journalism, whoever hosts it. Filtered for EVENT relevance, not just subject: a row is served only if it names \"alabama\" AND carries a term from this record's own subject line, or two terms from its market-question set. The subject's name alone is the key its corpus was sampled on, so it proves nothing about this event — each served row names the terms it matched in eventTerms.","status":"none-event-relevant","note":"Measured zero after event-relevance filtering: we sampled 4 attributable rows for \"alabama\" and not one could be shown to be about \"Election: Alabama & Republican\" — each carried the subject's name and nothing else this record is about. They are withheld rather than served: a subject's general coverage is not this event's reporting, and serving it under this record's label would be worse than serving nothing. That is a count, not a gap.","sampledForSubject":4,"served":0,"withheldNotEventRelevant":4,"relevanceTerms":{"subjectLine":["election","republican"],"questionSet":["republicans","governor","party","candidate","gubernatorial","senate"]},"items":[]},"record":{"label":"The record itself","basis":"our own count of documents we ingested and can name — not a claim about the world, and market questions are excluded because a question is not reporting","documents":183,"outlets":82,"activeDays":60,"firstSeen":"2026-03-12","firstSeenStatus":"observed","firstSeenNote":null,"lastSeen":"2026-08-31","lastSeenStatus":"observed","lastSeenNote":null,"homeDomains":["aerospace_defense"],"asserts":{"launch-release":12,"military-action":10,"legal-ruling":5,"utterance":3,"price-threshold":2,"disaster":2},"assertionCoverage":0.219,"movesWith":[{"name":"huntsville","together":76,"sharedDomains":["aerospace_defense"]},{"name":"florida","together":28,"sharedDomains":["aerospace_defense"]},{"name":"nasa","together":18,"sharedDomains":["aerospace_defense"]},{"name":"redstone arsenal","together":16,"sharedDomains":["aerospace_defense"]},{"name":"north alabama","together":14,"sharedDomains":["aerospace_defense"]},{"name":"texas","together":20},{"name":"trump","together":18},{"name":"georgia","together":17}],"movesWithLabels":["huntsville","florida","nasa","redstone arsenal","north alabama","texas","trump","georgia"],"provenance":"curated"},"coverageMetric":{"label":"Coverage state","basis":"our own measurement — our attention, not the event's state","direction":"insufficient_history","baselineRelativePct":null,"reading":"History still too thin for a baseline; day-over-day read.","trackedDays":null,"eventMentions":48,"periods":[{"period":"2026","mentions":48}]},"market":{"label":"Market expectation","basis":"attributed — markets price collective belief about defined outcomes; belief, not fact, and never proof that an event occurred","rowsStatus":"none-captured","rowsNote":"Measured zero: no priced capture rides \"alabama\" in this build.","current":[],"arc":[],"eventArc":{"name":"Election: Alabama & Republican","slug":"election-alabama-republican","questionCount":12,"questions":["Will the Republicans win the Alabama governor race in 2026?","Will the Republican Party candidate win the 2026 Alabama gubernatorial election by 30% or more?","Will the Republican Party candidate win the 2026 Alabama gubernatorial election by 25%-30%?","Will the Republican Party candidate win the 2026 Alabama Senate election by 35% or more?","Will the Republican Party candidate win the 2026 Alabama Senate election by 30%-35%?"],"mentions":48,"firstSeen":"2026-08-07","firstSeenStatus":"observed","lastSeen":"2026-08-09","lastSeenStatus":"observed","stampNote":null}},"judgment":{"label":"Our reading","basis":"derived judgment — our reading over the layers above; ours, and labeled ours","asOf":"2026-09-01","text":"A standard-tier record keeps its layers apart and does not collapse them. Lead subject \"alabama\" — named in this record's own subject line (\"Election: Alabama & Republican\"). The reporting, record, market and state-history layers below are that subject's own; none is borrowed from a neighbouring entity. Not bound: republicans, senate — the registry attaches them to this event, but the subject line does not name them. Our coverage metric measures our attention; the reporting is attributed, not verified against first-party issuers; the market layer prices belief, not fact. Reading any single layer as \"the answer\" is how a machine gets this wrong — and this record's honest limit is stated in its tier: no primary-source layer exists here yet."},"consensus":{"label":"Reporting consensus","basis":"retroactive claims ledger — kernel facts scored by independent-chain agreement","pending":true,"note":"No claims ledger has been computed for this subject yet — consensus scoring is full-tier machinery.","retired":[]},"stateHistory":{"label":"State history","basis":"recorded transitions — never edited after the fact","status":"recorded","note":null,"transitions":[{"field":"coverage state","from":"insufficient_history","to":"new","at":"2026-08-30T15:08:25.442508+00:00","heldSince":"2026-08-30T04:58:44.769155+00:00"},{"field":"wire tier","from":"watch","to":"flagged","at":"2026-08-30T15:08:25.442508+00:00","heldSince":"2026-08-30T04:58:44.769155+00:00"},{"field":"coverage state","from":"new","to":"insufficient_history","at":"2026-08-31T15:05:22.273998+00:00","heldSince":"2026-08-30T15:08:25.442508+00:00"},{"field":"wire tier","from":"flagged","to":"watch","at":"2026-08-31T15:05:22.273998+00:00","heldSince":"2026-08-30T15:08:25.442508+00:00"}]}}}